Disruptive technologies radically change the way we do things. They can create new markets, replace existing technologies and transform business processes. What about the way we teach and learn? The iPod from Apple is a well known example that has transformed the way we listen to and purchase music. More than that however, it has changed the way in which we can listen to audio material by using technologies such as podcasting. Podcasting takes the time dependency away from broadcasting. We now listen to audio or view video content at times and locations that are convenient to us.
In educational settings around the world innovative educators have recognised the potential of these types of devices and are incorporating them into their programs. Unfortunately some organisations see these disruptive technologies rather as disruptions and some have even gone as far as to ban them. There is no holding back progress though and new generations of disruptive technologies will just keep coming. Look at the Sony Mylo for example – this has all the features of iPods but is a wireless communications device as well. Users (eg students/teachers) can use it to communicate wirelessly using instant messaging, Internet phone calling and much more besides (eg sharing content wirelessly).
Other technologies just keep coming as well. Ubiquitous computing (computing everywhere) and wearable computers are other examples of technologies that will change the way we live and work. Virtual worlds are moving into the mainstream and are no longer the domain of ‘geeks’ or ‘technophiles’. Second Life – one of the leading virtual worlds on the Web turns over a staggering aount of money everyday. Major (global) organisations are recognising this and holding large scale events (such as concerts) in these worlds. Some educators are implementing and offering education and training in these worlds. What sort of impact could this have on education and training or rather, what sort of impact will it have?
Is it worth asking the question of your organisation – are these disruptive technologies simply disruptions that we should ignore or even ban, or do they represent opportunities for transforming the way that we can teach and learn? If we choose the former, what will be the consequences in the long term for our organisations and more importantly, for those for whom we have responsibility to educate? There are no easy answers to these questions but we cannot ignore them and should be doing what we can to make informed decisions.
Mylo
-
« Home
Pages
-
Categories
- Apple
- BETT
- biometrics
- blogging
- conspiracy
- copyright
- Creative Commons
- document freedom
- domain name
- e-framework
- e-portfolio
- Educationau
- filtering
- Firefox
- future
- game technology
- geo-tagging photos
- identity
- IMS GLC
- incubator
- innovation
- interactive whiteboards
- interoperability
- iPod
- IPv6
- iTunes U
- knol
- Learning Impact
- Linux
- livescribe
- locr
- marketing
- metadata
- mobile
- Mylo
- Nintendo
- OOXML
- open source
- openDSM
- OpenSocial
- patent
- persistent identifiers
- PILIN
- podcast
- Podmo
- privacy
- read-write web
- SCORM
- search
- Second Life
- SICTAS
- sictasft
- SIF
- Skype
- Skype phone
- SOA
- social networking
- standards
- tech truancy
- technology in education
- Uncategorized
- viewdo
- Virtual Worlds
- Web 2.0
- Wii
- wikipedia
- YouTube
-
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
3 Comments
Hi Jerry,
We haven’t met but if you want some disruption, I’m your man:)
Look would you pop into the forum and have a read through the main threads in this month’s discussions. You’ll notice there’s a discussion going on about tracking down the hives and social network tools. I’ve pointed at you as “the guy” who might be able to help us get some objective figurs on the numbers who buzz through the geoup.edns domain.
I’m really not interested in being disruptive. I just think our organisations are measuring the wrong figures.
oops!
http://www.groups.edna.edu.au/mod/forum/view.php?f=4630
Hi Simon,
I have just been reading through some of the posts that you mention and should probably continue this conversation in that forum as it will be valuable to capture all that conversation in the one place. In the meantime though, my comments are a bit naive as I haven’t had the opportunity to engage and really think about the topics there. Having said that though, I believe there is a whole raft of stats and measures that would be really interesting to get hold of if they are available anywhere and to analyse. As an example, I am a lurker on a number of forums and contribute in others but I would have to say that looking back on my personal history, I have consumed content far in excess to what I have contributed and really value what I have learned. I imagine I am not alone in this so a great deal of value is probably missing from the stats that are collected in general. I am also a big fan of inference modeling and understanding behaviours in order to help figure out how to add value to services. I am not sure if I am on the right track for you but I will be venturing back into the threads that you suggested to see if there is anything I can contribute.
Cheers,
Jerry.
Post a Comment