<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whatever happened to 1.0?</title>
	<link>http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jleeson/2006/12/06/whatever-happened-to-10/</link>
	<description>a blog by Jerry Leeson</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: jerry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jleeson/2006/12/06/whatever-happened-to-10/#comment-24</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jleeson/2006/12/06/whatever-happened-to-10/#comment-24</guid>
					<description>Oh no!  out of date already :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no!  out of date already <img src='http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jleeson/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jleeson/2006/12/06/whatever-happened-to-10/#comment-21</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jleeson/2006/12/06/whatever-happened-to-10/#comment-21</guid>
					<description>I think apprending 2.0 is cute. I might move right along to Jen 2.1 as 2.0 is so 2006. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think apprending 2.0 is cute. I might move right along to Jen 2.1 as 2.0 is so 2006. <img src='http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jleeson/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jleeson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jleeson/2006/12/06/whatever-happened-to-10/#comment-20</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jleeson/2006/12/06/whatever-happened-to-10/#comment-20</guid>
					<description>Hi Ian, twopointouch sums it up perfectly for me and I really enjoy your blog.  I guess my concern is with other people/organisations that append 2.0 to a concept or solution in what may be an indiscriminate manner or simply marketing.  2.0 seems to be a really easily exploitable term these days.
Cheers,
Jerry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian, twopointouch sums it up perfectly for me and I really enjoy your blog.  I guess my concern is with other people/organisations that append 2.0 to a concept or solution in what may be an indiscriminate manner or simply marketing.  2.0 seems to be a really easily exploitable term these days.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Jerry.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ian Delaney</title>
		<link>http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jleeson/2006/12/06/whatever-happened-to-10/#comment-19</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jleeson/2006/12/06/whatever-happened-to-10/#comment-19</guid>
					<description>Hey Jerry. I am not *yet* regretting having a 2.0 style domain name. But I am sure the time will come... I reckon the "ouch" part probably let's me survive into the backlash for a little while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jerry. I am not *yet* regretting having a 2.0 style domain name. But I am sure the time will come&#8230; I reckon the &#8220;ouch&#8221; part probably let&#8217;s me survive into the backlash for a little while.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
