As an occasional user of Twitter every now and then I get a message in my email letting me know that someone is following me. If it’s someone I know (ie have an existing relationship) I will generally follow them with out much further thought - after all it is someone that I already know either personally or via some social network. If I don’t know them however, its interesting to look at how I seem to be deciding whether to follow them or not. The message from Twitter provides me with a link to their profile and also a little information about them - their Twitter name, a thumbnail of their picture, the number of followers they have, the number that follow them and also the number of tweets they have posted.
Without going to their profile, this little amount of information seems to be a big factor on whether I follow them or not.
Firstly, their name - if it is known by me eg a person, brand or company name then I can make an immediate decision on whether I am interested or not. Their picture also has an impact. Unless their name is known by me, I find myself unlikely to follow a picture of some obscure symbol/brand or other inanimate object. Twitter is a social tool and I am interested in people so a human face is likely to hold my interest for maybe a few more nanoseconds.
Onto the statistics. Really if they are following over a thousand Twitterers and not many are following them, I am probably not even going to bother. The most I will do is just delete the message that they are following me.
If they have thousands of followers you know that there is going to be very little personal communication however if they are a person who has a lot of credibility and who I am interested in, then they may be very worthwhile following - after all, they (or someone working on behalf of them) have started following me.
If almost no-one is following them and they are following a very small number of people, I will check their profile out and give some serious consideration to following them. You never know, they may have some really interesting things to say and could just be getting started.
The number of Tweets statistic seems to be less important to me at the moment. If there is hardly any then maybe they are just getting started. If there are thousands of them though, that is a bit of a warning to me.
Which brings me to the sweet spot. I seem to be drawn to those who have up to a few hundred followers and who may be following a similar number of people.
As an aside, I am also interested in the ratio between following and followers. Extremes in either direction don’t seem right to me. The exception may be some sort of information/news feed that pushes out information that is really useful to me, which brings me onto news/information services. I still find it quite amusing how old-world media and journalists have joined the bandwagon - especially those that lambasted the social web not too long ago.
Of course anything at all that identifies them as Web 2.0 marketing experts or anything similar just tells me to completely disregard them. Get rid of these and Twitter will be a better place.
So… do Twitter statistics influence your decision making at all on who to follow in Twitter?
-
« Home
Pages
-
Categories
- accessibility
- Apple
- BETT
- biometrics
- blogging
- conspiracy
- content
- copyright
- Creative Commons
- document freedom
- domain name
- e-framework
- e-portfolio
- Educationau
- filtering
- Firefox
- future
- game technology
- geo-tagging photos
- identity
- IMS GLC
- incubator
- innovation
- interactive whiteboards
- interoperability
- iPod
- IPv6
- iTunes U
- knol
- Learning Impact
- Linux
- livescribe
- locr
- marketing
- metadata
- mobile
- Mylo
- Nintendo
- OOXML
- open source
- openDSM
- OpenSocial
- patent
- persistent identifiers
- PILIN
- podcast
- Podmo
- privacy
- read-write web
- SCORM
- search
- Second Life
- SICTAS
- sictasft
- SIF
- Skype
- Skype phone
- SOA
- social networking
- standards
- tech truancy
- technology in education
- Uncategorized
- viewdo
- Virtual Worlds
- Web 2.0
- Wii
- wikipedia
- YouTube
-
Archives
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
4 Comments
I used to get all excited Jerry at getting a “follow” notification. I am less so these days. I also used to delete followers whose description/website I didn’t like. I rarely do anything about them now. My main principle is that if my new follower is a name I don’t know, I may look, providing they don’t look as if they are collecting followers.
Twitter in general excites me a lot less these days
I always check the profile, and this is what makes me decide whether to follow. Anyone who seems to be marketing something…forget it. If they don’t have a photo of their own face..unlikely. If their profile details include an interest in e-learning….I’ll look further to read their last few tweets. And only then, if they seem genuine, have a human face and appear to be engaged in useful and interesting conversation…THEN I will follow them. Picky, huh? [grin]
Hi Marlene,
I think what you do makes a lot of sense. I am also much more interested in other twitterers if they use a picture of themselves - its nice to know you are communicating with a seemingly genuine person.
I’m really excited by Twitter … since I discovered the #edchat hashtag! Have learned so much by interacting with educators around the world. See http://bit.ly/mfc2D for more details.
Post a Comment